Lots of thanks to everyone for suggestions for the Adobe CC alternatives list.
Here it is, let me know if there's anything you want added/corrected:
(Natron looks good too but it seems to be no longer maintained, and its official website's certificate has expired.)
@switchingsocial how about alternatives for audio/podcasting?
I forgot to add any audio :O
Has anyone got any recommendations?
@Joe @switchingsocial Yeah, in that case probably Ardour. I still use Pro Tools personally (more music stuff than podcasts), but there are a couple other open source ones listed here I hadn't heard of:
I *have* mixed a track in Ardour, but it's not Ardour that's the problem - it's JACK.
Maybe Ardour on macOS is better because honestly, Apple got things *right* with CoreAudio; Pulseaudio and JACK are atrocious by comparison.
But for FLOSS on Linux, I'm not sure.
@Clipsey My issue with JACK is that it just straight up never supported my mixer properly (Behringer X32 over USB), and would chew up something like 30-40% CPU power just... running + connected, trying to hit low latency targets.
It was a lot of messing around with buffer sizes to minimize latency without getting buffer underruns, and at the time (which *was* a few years ago, now), bad latency made its way into the DAW(!!!) without any sort of correction.
@Clipsey So you'd record your first track, all is well. You record your second track, monitoring the 1st one, and you *swear* you played in time with that first one, but it feels... kinda off...
By the fourth and fifth track, you start to realise that if your JACK latency is ~50ms, then everything you're recording is ~50ms behind your monitoring and you have to manually nudge it all back over by hand.
I hope it's better now, but ugh - that forced me to put it in 're-review in a couple years'.
@kithop idk I don’t use that device, with my presonus audio box iOne and my midi keyboard I have very low input latency in Bitwig Studio.
@Clipsey I'm assuming by now they've solved the latency thing by correcting it in there automatically, too (at least I'd hope).
I might give it all another try once I get back into recording stuff again, but it was definitely a huge step back from CoreAudio's literal 'just plug it in and go'. That was one of the huge things Apple excelled at 10 years ago. No config files, no manually starting/stopping services, no multiple audio layers like ALSA/OSS/Pulse/JACK, just... ignore it and it works.
@kithop idk last time I tried core audio (on a hackintosh) it fried the audio chip lol.
I prefer configurability over plug and play, which is where JACK really shines.
@Joe @switchingsocial Checking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_audio_player_software#Protocol_abilities things seem to point to Amarok:
Apparently better podcast support is on their roadmap, for the next version:
Funkwhale instances accept one or multiple users. If you join an existing instance, like https://open.audio, you'd have to request some storage space to upload your work.
If you set up your own instance, you can of course do what you want, but regardless of your choice, if you share your work publicly, it will be eventually federated to other instance, and embeddable via an Iframe on third-party websites
This is Kithop's private, invite-only instance - hosted on FreeBSD in Canada.